First Bill, American Health Care Act

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PaulaJedi, Mar 10, 2017.

  1. PaulaJedi

    PaulaJedi Well-Known Member
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,943
    Likes Received:
    733
    I am getting a lot of "I told you so" comments and hate because I support Trump, but even though I identify as a Conservative, I find that this new bill benefits insurance companies only.

     
    creedo299 likes this.
  2. creedo299

    creedo299 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    22
    What they're trying to say, is that government owes nobody anything at all. This is what the speaker of the house is trying to pull off. What they're going to try to do, is put a voucher in pace, to try and cover cost. This is going to be a fiasco as this will not fund expensive operations.

    I think that it's kind of comical that they irradiated the 50s and 60s generations with atomic explosions, with no known result and now they're trying to get ride of some of these people, as they've go the potential to still file suet against the government.
     
  3. walt

    walt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2016
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    40
    In the real world we now live in there are NO guarantees in life, however in this country we have always treated all that need help as you see if you study the number of people that went to the hospital and never paid a dime for the services received. On the other hand if you add up the cost of the money paid to the insurance companies with Obamacare you may notice that half of the people on that program have paid Zero dollars ZERO! Logic says that someone always has to pay? Before the government use to pay directly to the unpaid doctors and hospitals, but now the folks that have been paying are paying Much, Much MORE to cover the cost of the Obama bums. I believe in protecting the weak, but NOT the Sick, Lame, and Lazy guy that won't get a job and lives with mother.
     
  4. creedo299

    creedo299 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    22
    The updated view of this problem is to put everyone on a vast adjustable database. The database follows you wherever you go in the world. What the powers that be in the U.S. have come up against and even reacted to some time ago, is that certain classes of people should and have become expendable.

    This is really nothing new, the same goes for the process of war, which is much more organized.

    It's just having to live with the hypocrisy of the government thinning out people, when the codeos of the land of the free and brave, is the title of this land.

    An example is in the book, (Brennan's War), to where the Sheridan Tank driver brings his tank back from a battle and the commander is the only one driving it. He had no boots on when he got out of the tank. His crew was killed off, as the 152 millimeter cannon failed to fire in the jungles of the SEA War. He was harassed by an upper ranking officer for not saluting and being out of military uniform.

    They had like a year two years to fix that damned main gun and did they ever do it? No they didn't, this is planned obsolesce and in that part, taking a few people along with the problem. The tank commander was taken aside by a more experienced commander who understood the war, to where he received new clothes and boots and socks.

    In the Obama campaign, they singled out the Babyboomers to kill off. This was in print in the newspapers and I had read it.
     
    walt likes this.
  5. walt

    walt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2016
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    40
    Now we wait and see if Trump will respect the old folks?
     

Share This Page